Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

CG

CASEYS GENERAL STORES INC (CASY)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 FY2025 delivered solid topline and gross profit growth amid integration of Fikes/CEFCO: revenue $3.90B (+17% YoY), EBITDA $242.4M (+11% YoY), diluted EPS $2.33 (flat YoY), with inside margin 40.9% and fuel margin 36.4¢ per gallon .
  • Strong operational KPIs: inside same‑store sales +3.7%, grocery margin +40 bps to 34.2%, fuel same‑store gallons +1.8% while total gallons +20.4% on unit growth; fuel gross profit +17.4% YoY despite lower margins, aided by store additions and share gains vs Mid‑Continent (-4%) .
  • Guidance updated: EBITDA growth raised to approximately 11% and FY2025 PP&E reduced to ~$500M; all other metrics maintained (inside SSS +3–5%, fuel SSS -1% to +1%, OpEx +11–13%, net interest ~$90M, D&A ~$410M, tax 23–25%, ~270 stores) .
  • Integration headwinds: one‑time Fikes deal/integration costs (~$13M in Q3) and higher interest/depreciation pressured EPS, with management reiterating Q4 dilutive EPS from Fikes due to incremental interest/D&A and added integration spend; fuel and prepared food margins blended down by ~2¢/gal and ~180 bps respectively from Fikes mix .
  • Catalyst: the guidance raise on EBITDA and strong store growth trajectory, plus clear synergy roadmap ($45M over 3–4 years, fuel/overhead first, prepared food later) provide medium‑term visibility; near‑term narrative acknowledges Q4 dilution and weather/leap day headwinds .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Inside performance: Total inside sales +15.3% and inside gross profit +14.3% YoY; grocery margin +40 bps to 34.2% with favorable mix and asset protection gains .
  • Fuel execution: Same‑store gallons +1.8% vs Mid‑Continent down ~4%, total gallons +20.4% and fuel gross profit +17.4% YoY, showing share gains and scale benefits .
  • Operational efficiency: Same‑store OpEx ex‑credit card fees +3.2% with same‑store labor hours reduced for the 11th consecutive quarter; management: “reduced same‑store labor hours for the eleventh consecutive quarter” .

What Went Wrong

  • Margin dilution from Fikes: Prepared food margin down ~180 bps, fuel margin down 90 bps YoY, primarily due to Fikes’ lower margin profile and January coffee promotion; one‑time integration costs ~$13M .
  • EPS flat YoY: Higher interest from Fikes financing and higher depreciation from operating more stores offset inside/fuel profit gains .
  • Q4 caution: Management flagged February weather and leap‑day lap; expects finishing the year at the bottom of the inside SSS range and Fikes dilutive to Q4 EPS (interest/D&A/integration costs) .

Financial Results

MetricQ1 FY2025Q2 FY2025Q3 FY2025
Total Revenue ($USD Billions)$4.098 $3.947 $3.904
Net Income ($USD Millions)$180.2 $180.9 $87.1
Diluted EPS ($)$4.83 $4.85 $2.33
EBITDA ($USD Millions)$345.8 $348.9 $242.4
Inside Margin (%)41.7% 42.2% 40.9%
Fuel Margin (¢/gal)40.7¢ 40.2¢ 36.4¢

Segment breakdown (Q3 YoY):

SegmentQ3 FY2024 Revenue ($USD Millions)Q3 FY2025 Revenue ($USD Millions)Q3 FY2024 Gross Profit ($USD Millions)Q3 FY2025 Gross Profit ($USD Millions)Margin/CPG
Prepared Food & Dispensed Beverage$349.4 $397.2 $208.3 $229.5 59.6% → 57.8%
Grocery & General Merchandise$865.5 $1,003.3 $293.2 $343.5 33.9% → 34.2%
Fuel$2,051.7 $2,366.8 $257.2 $302.1 12.5% → 12.8% ; Fuel gallons 689,251K → 829,761K
Other$62.6 $136.4 $27.8 $37.4 44.3% → 27.4%

Key KPIs:

KPIQ1 FY2025Q2 FY2025Q3 FY2025
Inside Sales ($USD Millions)$1,474.1 $1,467.5 $1,400.4
Inside Same‑Store Sales (%)+2.3% +4.0% +3.7%
Inside Gross Profit ($USD Millions)$614.3 $619.7 $573.1
Grocery & GM Margin (%)35.4% 35.6% 34.2%
Prepared Food & DB Margin (%)58.3% 58.7% 57.8%
Fuel Gallons Sold (000s)772,536 775,914 829,761
Same‑Store Fuel Gallons (%)+0.7% -0.6% +1.8%
Fuel Gross Profit ($USD Millions)$314.5 $312.3 $302.1
Same‑Store OpEx ex‑CC Fees (%)+0.7% +2.3% +3.2%

Note on estimates: S&P Global consensus EPS and revenue for CASY were unavailable in this session due to a request‑limit error; estimate comparisons are therefore not provided.*

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious Guidance (Dec 2024)Current Guidance (Mar 2025)Change
EBITDA GrowthFY2025“Increase at least 10%” “Increase approximately 11%” Raised
Purchase of Property & EquipmentFY2025~$550M ~$500M Lowered
Inside Same‑Store SalesFY2025+3% to +5% +3% to +5% Maintained
Inside MarginFY2025Comparable to FY2024 Comparable to prior year Maintained
Same‑Store Fuel GallonsFY2025-1% to +1% -1% to +1% Maintained
Total Operating ExpensesFY2025+11% to +13% (incl. $25–$30M one‑time Fikes) +11% to +13% (incl. $25–$30M one‑time Fikes) Maintained
Net Interest ExpenseFY2025~+$90M ~+$90M Maintained
Depreciation & AmortizationFY2025~$410M ~$410M Maintained
Effective Tax RateFY202523%–25% 23%–25% Maintained
Store AdditionsFY2025~270 ~270 Maintained
DividendNext payment$0.50/share (approved) $0.50/share payable May 15, 2025 Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1, Q2)Current Period (Q3)Trend
Fikes integration & synergiesClose Nov 1; Q3 dilutive on one‑time costs; synergy roadmap ($45M over 3–4 yrs); fuel/overhead first; prepared food later Q3 integration ~$13M one‑time costs; Q4 modestly positive EBITDA; prepared food margin drag; expect Q4 EPS dilution from interest/D&A Near‑term dilutive; medium‑term synergy capture
Fuel share/marginsOutperform region; CPG mid‑ to high‑30s; Q2 CPG 40.2¢ SSS gallons +1.8% vs region ~-4%; CPG 36.4¢; diesel strength noted Volume up, margin blended down
Prepared food innovationHot sandwiches/bakery strength; coffee initiatives; cheese headwind; margin ~58.3–58.7% Hot sandwiches up >50%; bakery ~+10%; coffee promo lifted units but pressured margin; margin 57.8% Ongoing innovation; margin mixed on promotions/mix
Ops efficiencyDigital kitchen planning; labor hours reductions; asset protection 11th consecutive quarter of reduced labor hours; SSS OpEx ex‑CC +3.2% Sustained efficiency
Macro/consumerLower‑income pressure but majority base resilient; value positioning vs QSR Recession concerns addressed; targeted promos; resilience; premium fuel up Stable consumer above lower‑income cohorts
Fuel supply chain (Fuel 3.0)Upstream procurement, terminal added via Fikes Continued build‑out leveraging Fikes assets/team Strategic capability build

Management Commentary

  • CEO Darren Rebelez: “Inside same‑store sales were driven by the prepared food and dispensed beverage category, with hot sandwiches and bakery performing quite well… Total fuel gallons sold were up 20.4% while total inside sales rose 15.3% primarily due to unit growth, including the Fikes acquisition” .
  • CFO Steve Bramlage: “EBITDA for the quarter was $242.4 million… the consolidation of lower‑margin [Fikes/SEPCO] stores drove ~150 bps of the prepared food margin decline, coffee promotion ~20 bps” .
  • CFO Steve Bramlage: “We now expect to achieve our target leverage ratio of approximately 2x by the end of the fiscal year, earlier than anticipated” .
  • CEO Darren Rebelez on innovation: “Limited release of new chicken wings and fries… encouraging results so far… not cannibalizing pizza; contributing incremental visits” .

Q&A Highlights

  • Fikes performance/integration: Early performance aligned with expectations; synergy cadence unchanged—$45M over 3–4 years, ~40% food synergies back‑loaded; fuel and overhead synergies first; Q3 EBITDA dilutive due to ~$13M one‑time costs; Q4 modestly positive EBITDA .
  • Fuel strategy: Outperformance driven by ramping acquired units and improving diesel programs; mothership CPG ~2¢ higher than consolidated due to Fikes blend .
  • Consumer and promotions: Value positioning vs QSRs remains compelling; targeted promotions via Rewards without higher spend; resilience across income cohorts with some lower‑income softness .
  • Coffee/wings pilots: Coffee promotion drove positive unit growth (2M cups given in January); wings test in ~225 Des Moines‑area stores shows high satisfaction and incremental occasions .
  • Q4 modeling: February weather/leap‑day lap; expect finishing year at bottom of inside SSS range; fuel margins mid‑30s in February including Fikes .

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus EPS and revenue for Q1–Q3 FY2025 were unavailable in this session due to a request‑limit error, so we cannot provide beat/miss vs Wall Street. Analysts should anchor revisions to the company’s raised EBITDA outlook (11%) and reduced PP&E ($500M), plus Q4 dilution commentary and margin mix from Fikes .
  • Expect models to reflect: lower prepared food margin trajectory near‑term, blended fuel CPG lower by ~2¢ from Fikes geography, Q4 EPS dilution from interest/D&A/integration costs, and faster deleveraging to ~2x by FY‑end .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • EBITDA guidance raised to ~11% for FY2025 while PP&E cut to ~$500M—supportive for near‑term cash flow and deleveraging; leverage target ~2x by FY‑end, earlier than planned .
  • Fikes integration is proceeding to plan; expect near‑term EPS dilution (Q4) from interest/D&A/integration costs, with fuel/overhead synergies first and food synergies back‑loaded across 3–4 years (~$45M total) .
  • Inside momentum remains healthy: grocery margin up, hot sandwiches/bakery strong; coffee/wings initiatives can drive incremental traffic albeit with promotional margin pressure—watch prepared food margin trajectory .
  • Fuel strategy delivering volume/share gains vs market despite blended CPG impact from Fikes; diesel recovery a positive read‑through .
  • Q4 caution: weather and leap‑day lap plus Fikes dilution likely to pressure quarterly optics; medium‑term story intact with unit growth (~270 adds) and synergy path .
  • Capital allocation: dividend maintained at $0.50/share; no buybacks until leverage target achieved—signals prioritization of balance sheet strength during integration .
  • Monitoring list: prepared food margin normalization as kitchens are added to Fikes stores, fuel CPG blend improvement from pricing synergies, cadence of remodel permits, and sustained inside same‑store momentum .

Consensus estimates from S&P Global were unavailable in this session due to system request limits; therefore, estimate comparisons are not provided.